Monitoring Wind Turbine Gear Oils with Online Sensors

Figure 1: Near-shore wind turbines

Introduction

We have known for decades that clean oil will improve system reliability and uptimeas well as prolong component and oil life in service [1]. This is especially top of mind for wind turbine owners and operators. Oil analysis is used to predict failure and hinder un-scheduled downtime. Howeverthe oil analysis mainly shows the status at the specific time of the sampleand it is difficult to ensure the sample is completely representative [2]. The oil cleanliness in a wind turbine gearbox (WTG) is hugely affected by loadidle or standstilland only sampling every six months makes trending even more inaccurate.

This is where online sensors show their value: they accurately monitor many times per hour and give immediate access to trending data. This article will evaluate oil cleanliness and the state of oil degradation/quality on 10 wind turbine gearboxes using online sensors.

Monitoring Oil Using Online Sensors

Online oil sensors give real-time data and help you predict a bad trendwhich could lead to a serious situation. The best online condition monitoring systems consider oil degradationwater content and particle count as well as machine load. In this paperwe will focus on particle counts and oil degradation/quality measured by resistivity since water issues are quite rare in wind turbine gear oil.

Obtaining the best possible installation point for the online sensors is vital to get the most representative data. Tests have shown that the offline/kidney loop oil filter circuit is ideal for online analysis due to the continuous homogeneous flow and suction from the bottom of the oil reservoir [3]. Optimum conditions are thereby present for the evaluation of particleswater and oil degradation.

Figure 2: Oil Quality sensor.

Oil Degradation Sensors

The oil quality or state of degradation can be evaluated using sensors that measure resistivitywhich correlates to oil aging by oxidationacidity and water content. Resistivity is well-known in the power industrywhere transformer oils have been monitored by resistivity for more than 5years [4].

A reduction in resistivity indicates the oil is degraded or contaminated. Resistivity sensors can thus be used to assess the oil quality/degradation and recommend actions such as sweeteningfiltration or a full oil change.

In gearboxesdegraded oil will often result in varnish and increased viscositywhich create problems like increased frictionpoor coolingetc. In additionthe oil may be difficult to pump during cold start-upswhich may lead to cavitation or even starvation. Oil degradation will reduce the oil’s in-service lifewhich will result in premature oil changesincreased gearbox wear and even risk of a complete failure.

The photo below shows progressive states of oil degradation [5]which can be detected by means of reduced resistivity (online Oil Quality sensor).

Figure 3: States of degraded oil.

Online Particle Counting

Particles will be created during the operation of any machineinfluenced by loadrotational speedoil temperatureoil additivesetc. [6]. But if the oil is kept mostly free from contaminantswear will be reduced to a minimum. Furthermoreit is much easier to discover an abnormal wear trend when the oil cleanliness is goodcompared to seeing an increase in particle counts in a very contaminated oil.

Benefits of Online Particle Counting

  • Early warning: if the trend increasesa worn component can be replaced before larger issues arisee.g.replacing a ball bearing before a total breakdown of the gearbox.
  • Oil analysis and maintenance can be scheduled according to the online datae.g.indicating a bad wear trendwhich requires an in-depth oil analysis or onsite investigation.
  • Instant data access and visible trends can support more precise decision-making in case of overhaulsas well as improved maintenance practices and intervals.
Figure 4: Condition Monitoring Unit with sensorsconnected to the CJC® offline filterwhich is installed as a kidney loop on the gearbox.

Trending Data Using a Web-Based User Interface

The data in this study is collected using C.C.JENSEN’s cloud solution (CJC® T2render) [7]which receives data from the CJC® Condition Monitoring Unit (CMU) [8]. The CMU can incorporate multiple sensorsbut in this studywe will focus on particle counts according to ISO 440as well as resistivityindicating the oil quality and state of degradation.

From the sensorsthe encrypted data are sent via a secure connection (4GWi-Fi or Ethernet) to a cloud-based solution for further analysis. The data can be provided directly to a surveillance system (SCADA system) or followed on a web-based user interface.

Alarms are sent to the operator by email or text message when pre-set limits are surpassed or when the individual system oil and equipment trend varies from normal operation. This reduces the complex and time-consuming interpretation of data from individual sensors from influencing each other.

Figure 5: The web-based graphical user.

Case Study — Monitoring Particles and Oil Quality/Degradation on 10 Wind Turbine Gearboxes

This study looks at data taken from 1WTGs installed in EuropeNorth America and South Americawith rated power from 0.MW to MW and a mix of on-shorenear-shore and off-shore installations.

Figure 6: A microscope photo of abrasive wear.
Overview:
  • 4 x SiemensMW (off-shore)
  • 2 x Siemens2.MW (near-shore)
  • 1 x Vestas V90MW (on-shore)
  • 1 x GE1.MW (on-shore)
  • 2 x NEG Micon0.MW (on-shore)

The 10 gearboxes were all fitted with a CJC® 3-micron offline/kidney loop oil filter for maintaining gear oil cleanliness. Some of the WTGs had the 3-micron offline filter (OEM fitted)and some had the filter retrofitted later in the WTG’s life.

During the operation of a gearboxany changes in loadstart/stoptemperaturewind gusts or other stress factors will create particles visible to the online particle counter. Smaller particlesup to 1microns in sizeare seen during normal abrasive wear (and 6-micron counts in the ISO 440codes)while particles larger than 1microns indicate severe wearfatigue or adhesion (14-micron and larger in the ISO 440codes).

Figure 7: Particle distribution curve for abrasive wearmeasured with an online particle counter

It isthereforeof the utmost importance to ensure that additional particles created during stress/load changes are removed as quickly as possible to limit the time in which they can damage gearspumpsbearingsetc. — anywhere with an ultra-thin oil film clearances less than microns. A particle wedged between moving surfaces creates hundreds of new particlessending the wear in an increasingly vicious spiral.

An increase in the number of 14-micron and larger particles indicates an ”out of normal” operationwith possible severe abrasionadhesion or fatigue propagation.

Figure 8: Microscope photo of severe wear.

Testing of particle distribution in used oil (Figures 6-9) shows that normal abrasive wear results in exponentially distributed particles with close to no particles of size 1µm or above. Microscope inspection of the worn surface support wear scars below µm.

When fatigue wear modes are investigatedthe distribution curve changes and particles larger than 1µm are detected in greater quantities. This is also supported by the visual surface damages that range from 5µm to 100+ µm in diameter.

It is essential that the oil filters can keep up with the particles generated during operation. If the filters cannotthen the oil will get progressively more contaminatedresulting in reduced component and oil life.

The particle counts on WTG oils with a 3-micron CJC® offline filter installed are typically ISO 15/13/1according to ISO 440(see test results Figure 10).

Figure 9: Particle distribution curve during abnormal wear generation (fatigue wear) measured with an online particle sensor.

Figure 10: Typical particle counts on WTGs with 3-micron CJC® offline filters (bottle sampling).

Table 3: Purity classes in accordance with ISO 4406
Number of particles per 100 ml
Over Up to Purity class
4,000,000 8,000,000 24
2,000,000 4,000,000 23
1,000,000 2,000,000 22
500,000 1,000,000 21
250,000 500,000 20
130,000 250,000 19
64,000 130,000 18
32,000 64,000 17
16,000 32,000 16
8,000 16,000 15
4,000 8,000 14
2,000 4,000 13
1,000 2,000 12
500 1,000 11
250 500 10
130 250 9
64 130 8
1.1 64 7
32 1.1 6
16 32 5
8 16 4
4 8 3
2 4 2
1 2 1

Particle counters typically use optical light extinction sensors [11]as do the online sensors in this study. The particle counts detect particles bigger or equal to micronsbigger or equal to microns and bigger or equal to 1microns. The counts are converted into ISO codes/classes according to the ISO 440table (see Figure 11).

The online particle counters used in this study are Oil Contamination Monitors (OCMs)[12]which measure the particle counts for five minutesaverages themand converts them into ISO codes; the cycle then repeats.

It is possible to see the ISO code trend as raw data or to smoothen data out over a 24-hour period.

Figure 12: Raw data of ISO codes for 1WTGs between 201– 2022.

Looking at raw data over a long periodsay four yearswill impair the opportunity to see a trendbut averaging the ISO code raw data into 2hours enables us to see the trend more easily.

Figure 13: Average 24-hour ISO codes for 1WTGs between 201– 2022
Figure 14: Box plot model explained.
Figure 10: Typical particle counts on WTGs with 3-micron CJC® offline filters (bottle sampling).

Analysis Results

Current Sample 11 previous samples not shown
Lab Number 2966908 2783652 2634838 2590081
Sample Rating
Date tested 03.11.2015 07.04.2015 13.10.2014 03.03.2014
Date of sample taken 26.10.2015 30.03.2015 07.10.2014 21.02.2014
Date of last oil change 21.05.2008
Top-up since change
Operating time since change
Total operating time 120940 115949 111806 106467
Oil changed no no
Additional Tests
AN/NN mgKOH/g 0.92 0.89 0.94 1.07
Cleanliness class ISO 4406 (1999) 15/13/10 15/13/10 18/17/14 15/13/11
A: >4pm = ISO >4pm Particles/100ml 18379 21297 236423 20047
B: >6pm = ISO >6pm Particles/100ml 4810 6879 85784 4174
C: >14pm = ISO >14pm Particles/100ml 556 856 9522 1652
D: >21pm Particles/100ml 140 182 2267 300
E: >38pm Particles/100ml 0 39 151 0
F: >70pm Particles/100ml 0 0 0 0
Cleanliness class SAE AS 4059 5A 5A 9A 5A
Figure 15: Box plot of ISO codes for the 1WTGsseparated into 4and 14-micron.

Applying the Box Plot

A box plot model can be used to average the ISO codes over four years.

Here the meridian is indicated by the red lineand 5percent of all data are in the blue boxwhile 99.percent of all data are within the whiskers indicated by black lines. Red points indicate outliers — measurements larger/smaller than 99.percent of the data.

Applying the box plot model to ISO codes (4and 14-micron particles) for the 1WTGs in this study:

Figure 16: Average oil cleanliness ISO code for the 1WTGs (4and 14-micron).

The wind turbine gear oils in this study arein generalall super cleanwith very few particles larger than 1micronsmeaning no indication of abnormal wear. The “normal” ISO codes for these 1healthy WTGs sums up to be:

5percent of the data are in the box from ISO code 10/7/up to ISO 14/11/6.

(ISO code equals only 32-6particles in 10mL oil.)

99.percent of the data are within the whiskers from ISO code 4/1/to 20/14/15.

Alternativelythis can be written as: ISO 12/9/+/-(5% of data) and ISO 12/9/+/- (99.% of data).

Evaluating the 1Wind Turbine Gear Oils in Terms of Oil Degradation

The same 1wind turbine gearboxes were also fitted with online oil quality sensorsCJC® Oil Quality Monitors (OQMs)to evaluate the degradation state of the oils by means of resistivity.

All WTGs were using fully synthetic PAO-based oilsISO VG 320from well-known oil manufacturers (CastrolMobilFuchs and AMSOIL)which were anonymized in this study as oil types to 5. The in-service life varies from three to more than 1yearswith two of the oils having an unknown age.

Figure 18: Trend for oil degradation/quality (resistivity) for the 1WTGs during 2019-2022.

WTGs to are using the same oil type — type — but with different in-service lives. WTGs and are also using the same oil type — type — but at different ages.

The oil degradation/quality is monitored online every five minutes by the OQM sensors (resistivity). In the following illustrationthe online data during the three years (2019-2022) are smoothened out over 24-hour periods:

Applying the box plot model to the resistivity data on the 1WTGs reveals a drop for oil type comparing the six-year-old to the 13+ years in service oils (WTGs number and 9)but doesn’t show a severe drop in resistivityso both oils are well maintained and don’t need to be replaced.

The five WTGs (numbers to 8)which were using the same oil type (4)showed an even clearer picture of oil degradation/quality between the three-year-old and nine years in service oils.

Figure 19: Comparing oil degradation/quality (resistivity) between WTGs number and with the same oil typebut different in-service life.

Unfortunatelythe age of the oil type was unknown on WTG number 8but since the resistivity has decreased so muchit is likely that the oil has been in service for many yearspossibly more than 1years.

If notthen the oil has been poorly maintained and very contaminated most of its life prior to the offline filter installation.

Figure 20: Comparing oil degradation/quality (resistivity) between WTGs number to (8) with the same oil type but different in-service life

Conclusion

The uptime of wind turbines depends on an efficient gearbox with clean oil. An offline oil filter (kidney loop) is operating continuously and should be able to remove the majority of newly generated particles. The CJC® offline oil filter has a very stable and consistent filtration efficiency and is able to keep up with particle generationmaintaining the WTG oil cleandry and varnish-free. This has been proven for decades in more than 135,00wind turbines worldwideutilizing CJC® offline oil filters on gearboxes.

Figure 17: Oil types used in the 10 WTGs.
WTG no. WTG output Oil type (anonymous) In-service life (years)
1 1.6 MW Type 1 Unknown
2 2.3 MW Type 2 5+
3 2.3 MW Type 3 6+
4 3.6 MW Type 4 3+
5 3.6 MW Type 4 3+
6 3.6 MW Type 4 9+
7 3.6 MW Type 4 9+
8 2.0 MW Type 4 unknown
9 0.9 MW Type 3 13+
10 0.9 MW Type 5 10+

Learning Points From the Study

Regarding oil cleanliness in terms of particle counting:

  • Healthy wind turbine gearboxes with well-filtered oil operate at around ISO 12/9/(+/-2)
  • Trending on small (4-µm) particles will give insights to:
  • Abnormal abrasive wear
  • Abnormal operation of the filtration system and possible faults
  • Trending on larger (14-4µm) particles can give insight to:
  • Severe abrasion/fatigue/adhesive wear

In terms of oil degradation/quality monitored by resistivitythe study shows:

  • The state of oil degradation and aging can be trended
  • Different oil types/brands have different levels of resistivityso a sudden change could indicate wrong oil has been added
  • Monitoring the oil resistivity trend can give insights to:
  • Stability of the oil quality and state of degradation (possibly reduce oil sampling intervals)
  • Remaining useful life of the oil in service

If you want to improve the power factor of your wind turbineit is best done by keeping the oil clean using a combination of good air breathersin-line oil filters and offline/kidney loop depth filters while monitoring and trending the oil cleanliness and state of degradation/quality.

Benefits When Improving Cleanliness and Monitoring the Oil for Particles and Oil Degradation/Quality:

  • Increased operational reliability due to less component wear and better oil conditions
  • Extended oil and machine component life due to less degradation
  • Reduced oil consumptionresulting in savings and lower environmental impact (COreduction)
  • Less downtimesince problems can be foreseen and maintenance scheduled according to the data trend and wear situation
  • Detection of abnormal operationhelping to find root causes more easily
  • Detection of changes in oil qualitye.g.wrong oil addedwhich could cause foaming or short oil life
  • Detection of abnormal wear. Replacing worn components proactively before a major breakdown occurs will yield large savings

Offline oil filters and online monitoring equipment do include initial costs but will result in large savings on the maintenance budgetplus an increase in the uptime and power factor for the wind turbine — offering a competitive advantage.

Online monitoring also adds additional safety and makes data trends readily available for interpretation.

References:

  1. R.S. Sayles, P.B. Macpherson, Influence of wear debris on rolling contact fatigueRolling contact fatigue testing of bearing steels. A symposium sponsored by ASTM committee A-on steelstainless steeland related alloysASTM STP 77(1982) 255–274.

  2. TormosB. (2013). Engine Condition Monitoring Based on Oil Analysis. In: WangQ.J.ChungYW. (eds) Encyclopedia of Tribology. SpringerBostonMA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_1149

  3. Henneberg M, Jørgensen B., Eriksen R. L. Oil condition monitoring of gears onboard ships using a regression approach for multivariate Tcontrol charts; Journal of Process Control 4(2016) 1–1http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2016.07.001

  4. Corugedo Alexander & Pérez BarcalaBeatriz & MonteroYosmari. The Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Diagnostic Tool of the Transformer Oil. Revista Cubana de Ingeniería. 5. 10.1234/rci.v5i3.288.

  5. Henneberg M. A method for Controlled Oxidation of Lube and Hydraulic
    Oils and Investigation of the Effects on Oil Parameters ; Oildoc2015January 27-29(Proceedings)RosenheimGermany.

  6. Wei Cao, Han Zhang, Ning Wang, Hai Wen Wang, Zhong Xiao Peng. The gearbox wears state monitoring and evaluation based on on-line wear debris featuresWearVolumes 426–427Part B2019Pages 1719-1728ISSN 0043-1648https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2018.12.068.

  7. https://www.cjc.dk/products/t2render/accessed 19-08-2022

  8. C.C.JENSEN A/S. Condition Monitoring Unit CMUAdvanced oil sensor system
    Product Sheet. 2020. url: https://www.cjc.dk/fileadmin/root/File _
    Admin_Filter/doc_Product_sheets/Monitoring_Equipment/ConditionMonitoring-Unit-CMU_PSMO4009UK.pdf.

  9. Henneberg, M. Eriksen R. L. Tribological test and optical measurements of particles and their distribution as function of wear mode; Oildoc2017January 24-26th(Proceedings)Rosenheim Germany

  10. https://www.cjc.dk/products/fine-filters/hdu-27/accessed 19-08-2022

  11. KrogsøeK.; HennebergM.; EriksenR.L. Model of a Light Extinction Sensor for Assessing Wear Particle Distribution in a Lubricated Oil System. Sensors 2018184091. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124091

  12. https://www.cjc.dk/products/monitoring-equip/sensor-package/oil-contamination-monitor-ocm15-advanced-online-particle-counter/accessed 19-08-2022

Illustrations:
  • illustration 1: Wind turbines in the ocean stock photo. iStock-1312167454.jpg
  • illustration through 912-13plus 15-20: C.C.JENSEN,
  • Illustration 14: Box plot model explained. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_plot
  • illustration 10-11: Oelcheck GmbH

For more information about CJC® offline oil filter systemsplease visit C.C.JENSEN’s main website www.cjc.dk

About the Authors

Steffen Nyman

Steffen D. Nyman is a certified ICML Machinery Lubrication Technician II and Lubrication Analyst I as well as 4-MAT trainer in adult teaching skills. He has conducted hundreds of customized seminars in understanding oil maintenance, analysis and filtration technologies for the Marine, Mining, Power, Off-Shore and Wind industries.

Morten Henneberg

PhD. in applied mathematics, Head of Innovation & Validation, C.C.JENSEN Denmark

Machinery Lubrication India